[07:56:09]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [issues] kay0u closed [issue #2421](https://github.com/YunoHost/issues/issues/2421): Can not view logs via YNH admin
[07:56:10]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [issues] kay0u [commented](https://github.com/YunoHost/issues/issues/2421#issuecomment-2247149410) on [issue #2421](https://github.com/YunoHost/issues/issues/2421) Can not view logs via YNH admin: Should be fixed now
[13:21:57]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [issues] zamentur [commented](https://github.com/YunoHost/issues/issues/2423#issuecomment-2247923220) on [issue #2423](https://github.com/YunoHost/issues/issues/2423) Replace fail2ban ?: So the answer, it seems, fail2ban eat a lot of ram if you search for more routes / regex. I guess yunohost apps should c...
[16:17:58]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunohost] yunohost-bot opened [pull request #1920](https://github.com/YunoHost/yunohost/pull/1920): Translations update from Weblate
[16:54:33]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> https://letsencrypt.org/2024/07/23/replacing-ocsp-with-crls.html
[17:02:22]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> so apparently CRLs are okay-ish compared to OCSP but it basically doesn't work for non-browsers stuff like curl / wget / git / npm etc hmpf
[17:03:02]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> if we had certificate as DNS records with DANETLS etc we woudln't even need CA in the first place
[17:03:21]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> though we would need DNSsec but maybe it's about time DNSsec becomes a thing ffs
[17:44:09]
<kayou> kamoulox
[17:45:51]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> sorry
[17:45:54]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> got carried away
[17:46:27]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> and apparently many people are complaining that DNSSEC ain't a magic solution because the security is debatable and DNS is sort of controlled by governments
[17:56:32]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] Salamandar created new branch clean_tokens
[17:56:42]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] Salamandar pushed 1 commit to clean_tokens: Remove github_bot_token and github_webhook_secret files, read values from config ([f9b3af4f](https://github.com/YunoHost/yunorunner/commit/f9b3af4f77464a601a102187c736aa0f84691577))
[17:56:45]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] Salamandar opened [pull request #66](https://github.com/YunoHost/yunorunner/pull/66): Remove github_bot_token and github_webhook_secret files, read values from config
[18:00:36]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] alexAubin deleted branch clean_tokens
[18:00:38]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] alexAubin merged [pull request #66](https://github.com/YunoHost/yunorunner/pull/66): Remove github_bot_token and github_webhook_secret files, read values from config
[18:00:41]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] alexAubin pushed 2 commits to master ([cd649f169422...74189494cbb0](https://github.com/YunoHost/yunorunner/compare/cd649f169422...74189494cbb0))
[18:01:35]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunohost] 🔴 Pipeline [#1384982166](https://gitlab.com/YunoHost/yunohost/-/pipelines/1384982166) failed on branch dev
[19:06:22]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [issues] MadMan247 [commented](https://github.com/YunoHost/issues/issues/2408#issuecomment-2248716171) on [issue #2408](https://github.com/YunoHost/issues/issues/2408) Being able to create backups without including the apps data: I see, Ill keep that in mind. That is functionality that I desired. While my thoughts were to be able to do this in web...
[19:43:58]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] Salamandar created new branch clean_tokens
[19:44:27]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] Salamandar pushed 1 commit to clean_tokens: Fix warning message ([d71b0af0](https://github.com/YunoHost/yunorunner/commit/d71b0af026c8a4a006cc2a3653af621444acad93))
[19:44:27]
<Yunohost Git/Infra notifications> [yunorunner] Salamandar pushed 1 commit to master: Fix warning message ([04f97eb8](https://github.com/YunoHost/yunorunner/commit/04f97eb8e56506572319499c06cf0fe83a16e31b))
[23:50:34]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> wtf I'm discoverying there's a `--prefer-binary` option in `pîp` ?!?!
[23:50:52]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> >Prefer binary packages over source packages, even if the source packages are newer.
[23:51:02]
<Aleks (he/him/il/lui)> does this means no compiling ?!?!